This player was not able to play in PSL, but in IPL 2025 this team made captain

0


Currently, fans are enjoying IPL. Which is now at its last stop. The first IPL qualifier of this season has been played on the previous day, which was between PBKS and RCB. In the first qualifier match, RCB registered a great win and got admission to the finals.

This season, many players as well as many teams have seen a lot of ups and downs. But among all these, a player was also present who was not worth playing Pakistan Super League PSL. But this season he remains the captain of the team in the IPL. So let us also give you information about this player.

After all, who is this player:

In IPL 2025, all teams have played their league stage matches. After which qualifiers are now being played. Many teams have performed very poorly this season, after which they have not been able to confirm their place in the playoffs. One of which is a team LSG. Whose captain’s performance has been very bad. Yes, we are talking about captain Rishabh Pant, which was bought by LSG team for Rs 27 crore. After which Pant has become the most expensive selling player in the IPL.

Pant’s captaincy did not bring color:

Rishabh Pant was associated with LSG with his team spending Rs 27 crore in the IPL mega auction. But they fail to perform according to their decay. Along with this, he was also appointed the captain of the team. But according to the price, Pant’s performance has been very poor. But Pant played 1 century against RCB in the last match.

Pant returned to the pavilion only after scoring 0 runs in the first match of IPL. LSG’s team stood at 7th in the points table due to poor performance throughout the season. But there was a time when the fans felt that the team could go into the playoffs but nothing like this happened.

Pant figures in IPL 2025:

When we look at the figures of Rishabh Pant this season, Pant has played a total of 13 matches. In which only 269 runs have been added to your account at an average of 24.45 and a strike rate of 133.16. Which reflects their poor performance.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.