Can the Supreme Court decide the deadline of the bill? President Murmu asked SC questions

0


Image Source: File Photo
President Draupadi Murmu asked these 14 questions to SC

President of the country Draupadi Murmu has raised questions over the decision to decide the Bills passed by the President and the Governors on the Bills passed by the Legislative Assembly. In fact, this verdict was given by the Supreme Court on 8 April. On this, President Draupadi Murmu reacted and asked 14 questions to the Supreme Court. The round of reactions to this decision of the Supreme Court has continued for a long time. Both the ruling party or the opposition, both raised the issue vigorously. President Draupadi Murmu has described this decision as contrast to constitutional values ​​and systems as well as encroachment of constitutional boundaries. He has sought his opinion on 14 constitutional questions from the Supreme Court under Article 143 (1) of the Constitution.

Draupadi Murmu asked these 14 questions to the Supreme Court

  1. What constitutional options are available with the Governor when the bill is submitted under Article 200?
  2. Are the governors bound by the advice of the Council of Ministers in using these options?
  3. Is the use of the discretion of the Governor under Article 200 under the judicial review?
  4. Does Article 361 impose a complete ban on judicial inquiry into the functions of the Governor under Article 200?
  5. Can the courts set a deadline for governors and determine procedures for governors while using their powers under Article 200, despite the lack of constitutional deadline?
  6. Is the President’s discretion under Article 201 under the judicial review?
  7. Can court set deadline and procedural requirements for the exercise of the President’s discretion under Article 201?
  8. Should the President take the opinion of the Supreme Court under Article 143 while deciding the bills reserved by the Governor?
  9. Are the decisions taken by the Governor and the President under Article 200 and 201, are justified before the law is officially implemented?
  10. Can the judiciary amend or cancel the constitutional powers used by the President or Governor through Article 142?
  11. Does any state law come into force without the approval of the Governor under Article 200?
  12. Will a bench of the Supreme Court first have to determine whether a case involves sufficient constitutional interpretation and then it will have to send a five -judge bench under Article 145 (3)?
  13. Are the powers of the Supreme Court under Article 142 extended from procedural matters to issue instructions that denote the existing constitutional or statutory provisions?
  14. Does the Constitution allow the Supreme Court to resolve disputes between the Union and the State Governments through any other means other than the trial under Article 131?

(Input-ANI)

Latest india news



Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.