Film made on Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath got permission to release
The film ‘Ajeya’ on Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has finally been allowed to release from Bombay High Court. The film’s makers moved the court after the Censor Board (CBFC) refused to give a certificate. After the hearing in this case, the court said that they will now watch this film due to not following the instructions given by the court to CBFC. After watching the film on August 21, further hearing was now held. The bench of Justice Revathi Mohite Dera and Justice Neela Gokhale heard in Bombay High Court.
The court said that we saw the film, but there is no problem in it. The court asked about the disclaimer, the film’s makers introduced. The court asked the CBFC counsel, did you see the film? He did not say, so the court asked that it should have been seen, the debate would have been easy. The court described the submitted disclaimer as better than before, as it states that the film is a ‘cinematic adoption’.
“You have objections in 21 places”
The court also asked the CBFC that if there is any problem, then you should also tell. The court said that we should order to release this film, you have an objection in 21 places … is there any specific objections? The court asked CBFC that you should tell where the film has violated the rule? CBFC told its objections … The court said that whatever objection points were told to us, we saw all that.
CBFC said that this film may tarnish Yogi Adityanath’s image. The court asked how did you read the book? CBFC counsel said, not read. The court said that they have promoted the book themselves. CBFC said that there is also a point of desecation, the court again said that there is no problem.
Example of case filed in Madras High Court
CBFC lawyers told the court to give a certificate to the film, but the court did not agree with the CBFC at many points. CBFC gave the example of a case filed in the Madras High Court, which tarnished the image of an individual. CBFC was repeatedly talking about defamation, but the court did not agree. CBFC said in its submission that the points that are being made in the film should be removed. If CBFC experts have told some points, on the basis of which they are included, this court said it is your opinion.
The court said that there is nothing in the film compared to what is shown on separate platforms. The makers of the film debated the example of CBFC’s Madras court and said that the family came directly in this case. The producers said that it is a fundamental right to tell the film. The court considered the manufacturers’ petition valid and said that the film will now be released. Following the court order, the producers will further determine the release date of the film by taking the order copy.
Also read-
Astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla met CM Yogi, family was also present
‘Help us, who is writing this letter?’, In the case of Pooja Pal, Akhilesh Yadav pointed to two people
Latest india news
