Shoojit Shikar
Shoojit Sarkar, one of the most famous filmmakers of India, has made a place in the hearts of people with its sensitive films. Known for films like Piku, Madras Cafe, October and Sardar Udham, this director has always been appreciated for his subtle perspective on life and society through cinema. Now he has shared his view on artificial intelligence, ie artificial intelligence, which is a subject that is debating in the creative industry. The director now considered the application of AI in filmmaking and explained why there should be moral responsibility at the core of the use of such technology. Maintaining a neutral but thoughtful stance, the filmmaker admitted that the technology is not painful unless it is used irresponsible.
Ethics is important aspect
In an interview with the zoom, the director said, ‘Ethics is an important aspect that applies to all our work. It is necessary to ensure that we do not violate borders. It depends on the person. If there is an important story that needs to be expressed and which can be expressed through AI, then I am ready for it. All this revolves around the misuse of technology and irresponsible behavior. If the technology meets your needs and makes your work easier, then I will adopt it. ‘
Even open talk on raanjhana
The filmmaker also spoke on the controversy arising on Ranjhana’s Tamil edition, Ambikapathi, which was re -released with AI Wali Ending. Although he admitted that he had not seen a personally released version, he emphasized the importance of protecting the creator’s vision. Sirkar said, ‘I have not seen Ranjhana, but I have heard about the changes made in it. This has always been the fight to protect every filmmaker’s work, as well as every form of art and talent in this country.
Emphasis on artistic freedom
The director released in October further emphasized that no compromise can be made on artistic freedom and it should be preserved in any case. He further said, ‘His creative vision should be preserved. We dedicate our lives to protect our art. No one should ignore it, nor should anyone underestimate it. I cannot comment on changes made in raanjhana, but we try to maintain our artistic freedom and freedom of expression. If someone has any vision, it is our duty to protect it. The challenge is only in that security. We should focus on its conservation instead of destroying it. ‘
