Trump will not be able to finish the birthright of the children of migrants, US court asked the verdict unconstitutional

Washington: US President Donald Trump will not be able to end the right to congenital citizenship to the children of migrants. Of america A federal appellate court on Wednesday made his decision unconstitutional. The court said in its judgment that the attempt to end the right to get self -citizenship when born in America is against the Constitution. The court upheld the decision of the lower court, which stayed the nationwide enforcement of the order.

What can happen next?

Please tell that this important decision is 9th U.S. A bench of three judges of the Circuit Court of appeals. Earlier, a federal judge in New Hampshire also banned Trump’s decision. Now the appellate court has justified the decision of the lower court and upheld the ban. In such a situation, this matter has now come closer to reaching the Supreme Court. The 9th circuit’s decision prevents the Trump administration from implementing the order under which the US deprives the children of illegal or temporarily in the US of citizenship.

What and said in the comment?

The judges wrote, “The district court properly concluded that the proposed interpretation of the executive order is unconstitutional to deprive many people born in the US. We fully agree with this conclusion.” This 2–1 decision U.S. District Judge John C. Kagonor retains the previous decision, who prohibited Trump’s efforts in Seattle and described it as an attempt to ignore the Constitution for political gains. However, the White House and the Department of Justice did not respond to the decision immediately.

Who gave a challenge to the lower court order

The case was filed by states such as Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon. He said that if birthright citizenship remains in force in only half of America, then it will cause serious administrative problems, so nationwide prohibitory orders are necessary. Although the Supreme Court has recently limited the power of the judges of the lower courts to issue nationwide injunctions, the 9th circuit found that the case comes in special exceptions that the Supreme Court has left open. Judge Michael Hawkins and Ronald Gold wrote, “We believe that the district court made no mistake by issuing universal prohibitory orders to provide full relief to the states.”

Judge Patrick Bumatay (appointed by Trump) disagreed. He said that the states do not have the legal right to sue. He wrote, “We should consider the demand for any universal relief with caution and doubt. The demand for ‘complete relief’ should not become a hidden way of universal prohibition.” However, Bumatay did not say whether to end the birthright or not to end the Constitution.

What does the 14th amendment of America say?

The 14th amendment of the Constitution states that whoever is born in the United States or naturally becomes a citizen and comes under the jurisdiction of the United States is an American citizen. The Department of Justice argors that “the jurisdiction of the United States means that citizenship is not automatically found on the basis of birthplace. But the state governments (such as Washington, Arizona, Illinois, Oregan) say that this citizenship clusters and the historic decision of the Supreme Court of 1898 ignores that it was said that it was said that the birth of the Chinese parents in San Francisco Was.

What is Trump’s order

Trump’s order claims that if the child’s mother does not have a valid immigration position or is temporarily in the US and the father is not an American citizen or not a valid permanent resident, the child will not be considered a citizen. At least 9 cases have been filed across the US regarding this order. (AP)

Latest World News